LOL! That's pretty funny, that would make a cool XSS attack.

[quote user="lanzz"][quote user="Iago"] Depends on the "stuff". The idiots who use JS to implement hyperlinks deserve to be tortured slowly to death in public. [/quote] how about idiots who use JS to implement checkbox-based radio buttons? let's see what's the biggest...

[quote user="Eternal Density"]Here's an interesting opinion on AJAX: http://valorin.net/thoughts/forget_ajax_use_jue/ [/quote] TRW is the comments on that site calling JavaScript "Java." As much as I hate Java, being a C# devloper I'd never sink to calling Java somthing that...

What's funny is that he's written it in JavaScript comments which are exposed to the outside world via ViewSource. He should have used server side comments to hide them like so... function modalwindow_show() { if (window.ActiveXObject) { <% // F*CKING internet explorer F*CKING lets the F*CKING lists...

The Nokia exploding-battery-recall is all over the tech newssites today, so I found myself wandering along to check if my battery was likely to a splode. Although I'm disappointingly unlikely to be on the receiving end of a delightful display of pyrotechnics, I did find an amusing display of WTF'ery...

I'll start with a classic: Right Click Revenue . Wrong on so many levels- People actually buy it It really does nothing You don't really have to buy it, you can find a link to the .js file in the source

Just come across the following in some javascript I'm going through - makes me worry for the sanity of the person who originally wrote it: if (begin != -1) // Note: != means "is not equal to"

I encountered this on a website I went to... Another example of security via JavaScript. Client-side banning? Via JavaScript? Brillant! What could possibly go wrong? *rolls eyes* <script type="text/javascript"> //Enter list of banned ips, each separated with a comma: var bannedips=["23.23.23.23...