|
Why is Everybody so clueless on the importance of Desktop Search to the Masses?
Last post 02-27-2008 8:30 AM by ammoQ. 2511 replies.
-
-
-
repeater


- Joined on 01-29-2008
- Posts 28
|
Re: Swamp Search is good for you
spenk:Just as a final point - when you create a sourceforge project and 'go open source' you really need to do other stuff such as post the application up for download, check code into the cvs repository so people can get access etc.
Spelling the name of his own project correctly might have also been a good place to start.
Also, I keep having to hold myself back from filing an "ENHANCEMENT REQUEST - Add desktop search functionality to Desktop Search" bug.
|
|
-
-
spenk


- Joined on 05-23-2005
- UK
- Posts 206
|
Re: Swamp Search is good for you
repeater:Spelling the name of his own project correctly might have also been a good place to start.
Good point, wonder how he will find it again if he doesn't know where to look to begin...
|
|
-
-
fist-poster


- Joined on 04-03-2007
- Posts 37
|
Re: Swamp Search is good for you
spenk: repeater:Spelling the name of his own project correctly might have also been a good place to start.
Good point, wonder how he will find it again if he doesn't know where to look to begin... He could use his search to locate URLs: each time you access an interesting web-site, append the url to a text file. Then SSDS won't have any trouble finding it and it can be easily modified (if it already doesn't support that) to paste the matches to clipboard. There is nothing you can't do with it if you have the flow-charts.
Remember that SSDS can locate a keyword by the beginning and the end of the word. You can search for "spec/swamp" and it will find "specatateswamp" as well as "spectateswamp". By the way: how does your favourite desktop search application compare to SSDS in searching the Web!?
|
|
-
-
DaveK


- Joined on 02-22-2006
- Posts 470
|
Re: Grepplers can make your data dance
SpectateSwamp: CodeSimian:In other words, you are proud of the fact that you have found a group that will put up with your shit without banning you and/or closing your threads.
Us Grepplers have put up with quite a bit as well. Haven't told you to FO. Not once. You keep comming back. Because you all know in your hearts that the Grepplers have it and the Indexers don't. Indexers are not as much fun as us Grepplers. Grepplers can make your data dance. Indexers can't To a child with a regexp, all problems look like a ".*"
|
|
-
-
Tommie


- Joined on 08-23-2006
- Posts 21
|
Re: Why is Everybody so clueless on the importance of Desktop Search to the Masses?
To SpectateSwamp, No one will ever be convinced! Stop this nonsense!
To all who have replied to this nonsense,
Thank [replace with leader of a religion to your choosing] this is 2008 and not some 100 years earlier and SS took the in obsessive interest in something he describes as Desktop Search. On top of that. He keeps referring to himself as the expert on that subject, no matter what everyone else is saying. What if it was the year 1900 or so and he was a self proclaimed medical expert? This idea alone boggles the mind and I'll leave it to the imagination of the reader to think of some horrible scenarios. Which might go like this:
Dr. Doug has the solution to an illness taking down the masses: the yellow fever. After some ten years of experimenting Dr. Doug, who now calls himself YellowHead, creates his own pedestal on the town square of many towns and start rambling about having a cure for the worst disease known to the masses. But lo and behold he has a solution which has extracted from his swamp near his residence, which he refers to as his shack. In this shack he has his own (Very Big) chemical set (version 5) and he's mixing up a deadly medication a some recipies of hundreds of years back. What if some of the masses tried this medication?
I had a lot of fun reading all this 2000+ posts nonsense but it has to stop somewhere I think ... let's just all ignore him.
Finally I'd like to give you my interpretation of his definition on Desktop Search: "Searching some text in a file using a desktop application." * turning off the email subsciption to this thread *
|
|
-
-
DaveK


- Joined on 02-22-2006
- Posts 470
|
Re: Why is Everybody so clueless on the importance of Desktop Search to the Masses?
Tommie:Finally I'd like to give you my interpretation of his definition on Desktop Search: "Searching some text in a file using a desktop application." I think he's basically reinvented the filing system that I used when I was a teenager... keep everything in one big pile in the middle of the floor and then you always know where to look for anything straight away!
|
|
-
-
SpectateSwamp


- Joined on 12-05-2006
- Desktop Search & Video - Look OUT!!!
- Posts 697
|
Why is Everybody so clued-in on the importance of Desktop Search - This Thread!
More Spectate Excitement comming your way. The latest video. With a screen ReShoot of a Cam Studio recording. (Never done before ever) Try this at home. Better than K-Tel Free. An auto catalog of all my mpg on c:\ and double random turned on. You gotta see this. Soon (45 minutes maybe)
Desktop Search - Computing's EASY button
|
|
-
-
rc_pinchey


- Joined on 08-15-2007
- Posts 202
|
Re: Why is Everybody so clued-in on the importance of Desktop Search - This Thread!
SpectateSwamp:An auto catalog of all my mpg on c:\ and double random turned on. Arg! Double-random goat porn!
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: Swamp Search is good for you
spenk:Just as a final point - when you create a sourceforge project and 'go open source' you really need to do other stuff such as post the application up for download, check code into the cvs repository so people can get access etc. Uh, hello? It is open source. He is obviously waiting for some "nerd" here to do all that work for him. The common man doesn't need to know about no CVS.
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: Why is Everybody so clueless on the importance of Desktop Search to the Masses?
Tommie:* turning off the email subsciption to this thread * OMG, you had email subscription turned on? That's 14000 seconds of your life wasted, copying and pasting your mails to inmail.txt. You poor sob.
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: Why is Everybody so clued-in on the importance of Desktop Search - This Thread!
SpectateSwamp:More Spectate Excitement comming your way. The latest video. With a screen ReShoot of a Cam Studio recording. (Never done before ever) Try this at home. Better than K-Tel Free. An auto catalog of all my mpg on c:\ and double random turned on. You gotta see this. Soon (45 minutes maybe) NOBODY CARES YOU RETARD.
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: Swamp Search is good for you
fist-poster: spenk: repeater:Spelling the name of his own project correctly might have also been a good place to start.
Good point, wonder how he will find it again if he doesn't know where to look to begin... He could use his search to locate URLs: each time you access an interesting web-site, append the url to a text file. Then SSDS won't have any trouble finding it and it can be easily modified (if it already doesn't support that) to paste the matches to clipboard. There is nothing you can't do with it if you have the flow-charts.
Remember that SSDS can locate a keyword by the beginning and the end of the word. You can search for "spec/swamp" and it will find "specatateswamp" as well as "spectateswamp". By the way: how does your favourite desktop search application compare to SSDS in searching the Web!?
Sadly, although you are being sarcastic, that is probably a 100% accurate description of Swamp's workflow.
|
|
-
-
SpectateSwamp


- Joined on 12-05-2006
- Desktop Search & Video - Look OUT!!!
- Posts 697
|
Auto Catalog and Double Random Playback in under 2 minutes FLAT
Desktop Search - Computing's EASY button
|
|
-
-
stolen_username


- Joined on 05-08-2007
- East Lansing, MI
- Posts 64
|
Re: Auto Catalog and Double Random Playback in under 2 minutes FLAT
SpectateSwamp:
What? What was that supposed to demonstrate?
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: Auto Catalog and Double Random Playback in under 2 minutes FLAT
stolen_username: SpectateSwamp:
What? What was that supposed to demonstrate? I'm not sure, but I think I speak for everyone here when I say I'VE GOTTA GET ME SOME OF THAT HOTNESS. (Psst, maybe if we pretend to like SSDS, SS will go away for a while.)
|
|
-
-
CodeWhisperer


- Joined on 02-27-2006
- Redmond, WA
- Posts 437
|
Re: Auto Catalog and Double Random Playback in under 2 minutes FLAT
SpectateSwamp:The latest Screen Re-Shoot Using Cam Studio Playback.
This answered nobody's questions...and raised a few, like why are you using CamStudio and a hand-held camera?
-cw
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: Auto Catalog and Double Random Playback in under 2 minutes FLAT
CodeWhisperer: SpectateSwamp:The latest Screen Re-Shoot Using Cam Studio Playback.
This answered nobody's questions...and raised a few, like why are you using CamStudio and a hand-held camera?
-cw
Because uploading his Cam Studio videos to Google Video unacceptably reduces the resolution/bit rate so that the text is impossible to read, and he thinks the only solution is to "re-shoot" the whole thing using his camcorder. This is the same guy who posted his '93 Yellowhead election video by re-shooting the video that was already playing on a TV. When all you have is a camcorder, everything looks like a....Fuck, I don't even know how to finish that sentence. (The funniest thing is that he is violently opposed to video editing using software, yet he will happily "reshoot" videos playing on his laptop screen.)
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: Auto Catalog and Double Random Playback in under 2 minutes FLAT
CodeSimian:Because uploading his Cam Studio videos to Google Video unacceptably reduces the resolution/bit rate so that the text is impossible to read, and he thinks the only solution is to "re-shoot" the whole thing using his camcorder. To further clarify, somebody here asked him: "Why on earth are you shooting your laptop screen with a camcorder, why not use a decent screen capture utility like CamStudio?" He did, and Google Video made the resulting caps unreadable, so once again he COMPLETELY MISSED THE POINT, and started re-shooting his Cam Studio videos with his camcorder.
|
|
-
-
WWWWolf


- Joined on 12-05-2005
- Oulu, Finland
- Posts 234
|
Re: Auto Catalog and Double Random Playback in under 2 minutes FLAT
CodeSimian:When all you have is a camcorder, everything looks like a....Fuck
Yes, everyone enjoys their new toys! When you've got a new camcorder, you've got to video in everything you think of, no matter how pointless it is!
(I've already said I've learnt almost everything worth knowing about software engineering from the Ultima game series developer quotes. The rest of the quotes that aren't educational consist of surreally out-of-context quotes not unlike the quote above. =)
mysql> help contents; Nothing found Please try to run 'help contents' for a list of all accessible topics Desktop Search Rain - Gothic Computing's EASY button ( Go wild^H^H^H^H figure)
|
|
-
-
GettinSadda


- Joined on 05-25-2006
- North-East Scotland
- Posts 262
|
SSDS is slow - it's official!
Hey, from the comments on Specatate's blog: SpecatateSwamp:Now for a wishlist for
the new year ... A speed
version?
So, the current version must be slow then. QED
Linux is not a code base. Or a distro. Or a kernel. It's an attitude. And it's not about Open Source. It's about a bunch of people who still think vi is a good config UI.
Notice: Phorm, and its agents including ISPs collecting data on Phorm's behalf, are specifically forbidden from performing any processing or monitoring of the content of the above post. Hence, under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 any such attempt to profile this page by Phorm or its agents is illegal.
|
|
-
-
CodeSimian


- Joined on 02-08-2008
- Posts 758
|
Re: SSDS is slow - it's official!
GettinSadda:Hey, from the comments on Specatate's blog: SpecatateSwamp:Now for a wishlist for
the new year ... A speed
version?
So, the current version must be slow then. QED No, no, no. That is a speed version, not a speedy version. You need a different version to use when you are high on speed. Come on!
|
|
-
-
GettinSadda


- Joined on 05-25-2006
- North-East Scotland
- Posts 262
|
OK, I have changed my mind - I have figured out how to get rid of Specatate for good. Everybody repeat after me: Oh my God, I have seen the light - I now understand how perfect SSDS is. Your job here is done - please go forth and spread to good word to someone else.
Linux is not a code base. Or a distro. Or a kernel. It's an attitude. And it's not about Open Source. It's about a bunch of people who still think vi is a good config UI.
Notice: Phorm, and its agents including ISPs collecting data on Phorm's behalf, are specifically forbidden from performing any processing or monitoring of the content of the above post. Hence, under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 any such attempt to profile this page by Phorm or its agents is illegal.
|
|
-
|
|